Tension Treatises

Search

Recent Comments

Most Commented Posts

Categories

Archives


Neighborhood Ecclesiology
05/26/06 - 01:58:43 pm
Categories: Ecclesiology, Economics

Wendell Berry wrote the essay, The Ideal of a Local Economy. In it he discusses the idea of a neighborhood economy. It is a subsistence economy where people can control the morals of production and seek to assist one another rather than a production economy that limit not only products, but neighborhoods to units. Units have no feelings and units do not suffer. But neighborhoods do and neighborhoods watch each other.

For Berry, it is important to have economy be local. This does not mean that it is not a portion of a larger economy, but that the dynamics of the economy stem from the local economies.

I wish to apply this to the church as well. The Church, universal is essential, but the dynamics come from the local church and the neighborhood churches. They certainly may not be as efficient, nor as fun, but one thing can be said about the neighborhood church - it understands its local community. It thrives or suffers with its local community.

From Berry's essay:

In a viable neighborhood, neighbors ask themselves what they can do or provide for one another, and they find answers that they and their place can afford.


I like that understanding of neighborhood and want to apply it to ecclesiology. If local churches remember their neighborhood rather than searching to be the corporate conglomerate, they would ask what they could do or provide for their community, they would find answers and they would supply as possible. Not only could they do this with their local community, but other churches within that community.

In this way, if the community suffers, the church empathizes, suffers with and reminds of Christ's joy in times of suffering. They provide a stable outlet of hope. If the community thrives, the church provides the same outlet of hope in the expression of thanksgiving and joy.

Under the neighborhood model, imports and exports are not shunned. Churches do not need to look outside for resources that they can produce locally. When a resource would be deemed helpful and cannot be produced locally, then the church looks outside and imports it as necessary, tailoring it to fit the local need. The conglomerate church can assist in these exotic resources. Also, local churches can send their surplus out. This surplus can be in the financial form or bodily form and can be used by local churches outside the neighborhood that may need it.

Specialty shops occur in the neighborhood, but not at an alarming rate. These specialty shops in ecclesiology appear in the form of a para-church. Too many para-church organizations, especially those focusing away from the neighborhood start to strip the neighborhood of precious resources. An appropriate amount can add specialized and specific resources to build the neighborhood.

Berry quotes Albert Schweitzer near the end of his essay:

Whenever the timber trade is good, permanent famine reigns in the Ogowe region because the villagers abandon their farms to fell as many trees as possible.


As long as specialized, unitized churches are in demand, the local community experiences spiritual famine because each church seeks to mass produce and the community around fails.

Churches need to have a neighborhood ecclesiology. With other local churches, they can be the dynamic of the Church universal, propelling the mission of Christ to make disciples of all and administering the hope of the Gospel.


Comments:

Comment from: Dave [Member] Email · http://www.mindfulmission.com

P.S. Wendell Berry rules...

PermalinkPermalink 05/27/06 @ 12:07
Comment from: Will Haskins [Visitor]

I am curious to read Berry's essay. I often wonder about the extent that sustainable economy folks, especially those arguing for small local economies, rely on a manufactured nostalgia for the "green grass" on the other side of the creek. Particularly, how would a locally based economy respond to a regional disaster such as what befell the people of Yogyakarta or the folks who suffered under Katrina? Some would argue that the last example would not have taken place were it not for international economics, but I would offer the additional example of Galveston, which in 1900 suffered a devastating hurricane that killed 10,000 displaced more and ultimately accounted for the preeminence of Houston and the decline of Galveston. It would seem to me that larger economies would be better able to respond to this type of disaster by pulling on unaffected regions.

PermalinkPermalink 05/30/06 @ 19:47
Comment from: Kevin [Member] Email

I wonder about the "manufactured nostalgia" of the American Dream - Bigger is Better mentality. It seems to me that in some ways things have gotten better, but that some great things have been displaced - like any senses of loyalty or true community.

So that leaves us with a global community that cares only in situational disasters. We wait until the big news story before we care. Certainly a lot can be done with the large economy, but many people are existing, barely meeting their needs, while the world around them crushes them. We have a strong earthquake - "lets help" the big economy says...but they forgot about all those starving, poor people for the last two decades.

We have a Katrina - big economy says, "here is some mula" - and thank God for it, but the big economy forgot to take into the community needs, the improvement of levies.

I am confused about those who want small government, where people rule themselves on a more local scale - that is until money is involved. They push for local, local, local - let the people do it. Free the system for them, yet when it comes to economy it is the big guy they root for. Centralizing the money into a couple of corporate giants, few of which give little care beyond their profit (this may be an over generalization, but frankly with the amount of people starving in the world and the CEO compensation packages it will take a lot to convince me otherwise).

I know there are dangers to sustainable economy leanings, but a market economy is pretty corrupt. Maybe if it worked outside of the realm of over-profiteering (naturally sustainable economies have to hold under the same principal) then maybe it would be acceptable.

PermalinkPermalink 05/31/06 @ 09:48
Comment from: Dave [Member] Email · http://www.mindfulmission.com

Will...I would agree with you that a global economy is more suited to respond to large disasters. But local economies are better suited to prepare for them.

On top of that, local economies are better for the enviroment, specifically by limiting the consumption of fossil fuel.

And you also have to weigh the good and the bad - the chances of a large-scale disaster destroying an economy? Not very good. Global economies destroy the environment and destroy the economies of regions around the world each day. Large-scale disasters destroy an economy/community very rarely.

PermalinkPermalink 06/04/06 @ 09:41
Comment from: Kevin [Member] Email

Dave - it does seem however that one disaster, however rare will inevitably destroy the local economy. Which, basically sucks for them. Look at some rural villages in Pakistan or now Indonesia, who cannot get aid. They were subsistence economies and are left in ruins.

I would also pose that local economies do not have to be better for the environment or limiting fossil fuel consumption. Though it is the practice now, if the global economy does get off of fossil fuels, then the arguement does not work. Granted...until then, we can happily blame the large economy for destroying our world.

It would be nice to have an appropriate mix. I am so interested in the paradox of local and global and the differing philosophies.

PermalinkPermalink 06/05/06 @ 11:09

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, a, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Hosted by
the mindful mission

Friends
Syndication

Subscribe with Bloglines

Add to My Yahoo!

Credits

b2evolution