Tension Treatises

Search

Recent Comments

Most Commented Posts

Categories

Archives


Da Vince Code - not anti-evangelism
05/11/06 - 09:34:59 am
Categories: Ministry

Does the Da Vince Code undermine Christianity? Can it really? Maybe the problem is that Christians undermine Christianity. Are we afraid that an author has inspired people, awaking the sleeping giant within that fears the Church? Is there reason for the Church to be feared?

Certainly it is to be feared. For centuries Christians have been a walking chaos. We are human, fallen into selfishness, pride, nationalism, religionism and wield quite the tempers. Christianity no longer has the authority that it had cherished for so long and Christians do not know what to do about it. Has God been defamed? If your answer to that is "yes" I think your view of God is really miniscule and you align yourself with Nitzche more than you like as we would then have the power to "kill God". I for one do not think we are undermining God and the Da Vince Code does not undermine God or God's people either.

God's people need not feel the pressure of undermining because we need not be prideful about our religionism. If God truly is our source of joy, hope, power and authority, then why do we let a little book, written well enough to catch people's attention ruffle us into thinking God is greatly injured. No it is not God, but his people, but God is the divine Healer correct. So why worry?

Instead of viewing the Da Vince Code as anti-evangelism, stripping people of their faiths, why don't we produce better things that bolster peoples' faiths? For so long the Church has been seen as unwilling to dialogue. That may have worked for a time, but now the Church does not have the silent authority. People are going to ask questions of it and since it was a powerhouse for so long in history, the Church will suffer twice as much ridicule and scrutiny.

But that is ok. I believe we have been forewarned in our own scriptures of this scrutiny and we need not fear. Instead of reviling against somebody, why not engage the author intellectually in dialogue rather than debate. Why not allow for good creativity to come from the Evangelical world - from music, to art, to penmanship.

Maybe instead of worrying about anti-evangelism, we need to really evangelize. We need to go hit our communities and build the relational trust that the community needs. A guest speaker in my conflict transformation class last night is writing his dissertation about conflict between races in the Los Angeles Metropolitan area. His contention is that the missing Peace (Piece) is the Church.

Where has the Church gone? Why has it run from God's mission? Because we are spending so much time fighting the Da Vince Code. The Church is full of fist-shakers and loud voices, but that is certainly not the picture of the salvific Jesus. To be sure, he rebukes wrong doing, but he does so after treating women with respect; drawing in the sand and thus rescuing a prostitute from death; pulling a small, slimy man out of a tree and dining with him.

Church members, me included, we need not let fear of anti-evangelism worry us if we are truly evangelizing. True evangelism is highly political and highly bi, tri or multi-partisan. Evangelism is to announce the kingdom of God that is here now and yet to come. The elected leader created the kingdom and is in no position to lose the seat on the throne. It is the constituents that need to be won and the grass-roots campaign that God has embarked on does not include fighting exceptional books; it includes loving the people around you and producing expression with the quality that God has blessed artists with.


Comments:

Comment from: work [Visitor] · http://michaelwork.blogspot.com

Kev,
One thought. My experience's been that the Da Vinci Code hasn't really promoted dialogue, because the theory's so shoddy that any arguments and positions built on it usually have to be deconstructed before any halfway intelligent conversation can take place. Its value may be in drawing out perceived wounds and emotional scars, but as for intellectual dialogue, there's little to nothing there.

Along those lines, my frustration with Dan Brown's book and the upcoming movie has primarily to do with the negative correlation between the popularity of the material and the backing for the ideas within. Simply put, I protest it more as a scholar than as a Christian, and count this book alongside people like Falwell and Robertson, who just tend to make my life a lot more frustrating than it needs to be.

IIRC, when i read the book two years ago, I groaned upon seeing the stupidity that the Teabing character, written as a top-notch scholar, attempts to pass off as 'stunning conspiracy theory, with hidden documents to boot!' (Ch. 55-61, primarily 55) Having since heard it echoed, often with even less backing than Brown (who at least pretends to know what he's talking about), I'm just tired of the endless time-wasting half-baked conspiracy theories that center around the book.

Maybe this is just my self-centeredness and desire to have conversations worth having, but i've got better ways to spend my time than going through history 101 and explaining that pretty much every reputable historian rejects the take on Nicea, titular Christology, the gnostic gospels, canon formation, etc, that the novel presents. The typical response to that point? Really bad counter-arguments that excuse ignorance for the sake of 'intrigue.' I make a concerted effort not to be an academic elitist, but when it hits this point, it's all i can do not to just call folks out on foolishness and stubbornness...

That's my rant.

PermalinkPermalink 05/15/06 @ 04:36
Comment from: Kevin [Member] Email

Work - thanks for the comment.

If I was half as smart as you, I would probably agree with you on the intellectual stuff and if I had actually read the book.

As for conspiracy stories, they are a dime a dozen and truly do frustrate life - but gotta give credit to Brown who let one emerge that got people's attention. Besides, it helps the market - especially Christian apologists. They end up buying his books so that they can read them, then they in turn produce their own books so Christians can read them. Both books are sold, read and people actually give a damn about something - be it the wrong thing. I wouldn't be suprised if some of the Christian publishing companies gave kick-backs to Brown for publishing this controversial book - oops there is a conspiracy story of my own. Ha!!

The illegitimacy of the book not withstanding, the fault lies mainly with the reader who takes a work of fiction as history. I find the same problems in the Left Behind series, half of which I did read. Like I said, I haven't read Brown's book, but it has to be better written than those.

PermalinkPermalink 05/15/06 @ 08:57
Comment from: leo udtohan [Visitor]

There is nothing wrong about the movie. the church has nothing to be afriad if they don't hide something. dan brown's is just telling the truth and what he believes is true. it's up to the people if they will take their faith. it is just take it or leave it.

PermalinkPermalink 05/19/06 @ 01:09
Comment from: Kevin [Member] Email

Hey Leo,
Thanks for visiting. I find it hard to believe that Brown is telling the truth or believes that he is. He is a novelist, inspired by a 1950's conspiracy theory, that he explicates pretty well from what I hear. The fact that the book is sold as fiction already removes it from the truth field.

I certainly agree that the Church has nothing to be afraid of if they don't hide something, but even if there was a conspiracy theory, the majority of the people wouldn't feel as if they were hiding anything anyways, so have no need to fear. What they fear is a culture that is hostile to Christianity because of a made up conspiracy.

PermalinkPermalink 05/19/06 @ 08:56
Comment from: Mimi [Visitor] Email

the da vinci code does undermind God and his people

PermalinkPermalink 11/27/06 @ 11:57
Comment from: Kevin [Member] Email

Mimi,
I hate to say it, but God is only undermined in popular culture if you allow Him to be. Is God not big enough to brush off the heresy? No, what God takes more offense to is that his people care more about movies than the poor and dying in the world.

PermalinkPermalink 11/27/06 @ 11:59

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, a, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Hosted by
the mindful mission

Friends
Syndication

Subscribe with Bloglines

Add to My Yahoo!

Credits

b2evolution