While I think that you are right, and Hillary has lost, she I believe it is still mathematically possible for her to win. However it pains me to say this but she is right. I have heard very little about the environment from either one of these candidates. She could come to Oregon, where I live, and drum up a lot of support if she appears to be the pro-environment out of the two.

Well... I do agree that we have not heard enough about the environment in this campaign, which is odd, being that we have had about 12 years of campaigning and 473 debates in this primary season.

But I still believe that it is a waste of time and money, and that Obama should refuse to debate her based on the idea that she no longer has a legitimate chance of winning.

As I saw another blog ask, should we also invite Edwards, Dodd, Biden, Kucinich, and Gravel to the debate?